Why this problem mattersA large universe is not automatically a qualified market.
Organisations may appear relevant because of an industry label, keyword, location, product, customer market or similarity to organisations already considered suitable.
Those characteristics may help identify candidates. They do not automatically establish eligibility.
The market therefore needs to be defined by the conditions that materially determine inclusion, rather than by whatever information happens to make organisations discoverable.
Candidate discovery identifies organisations worth evaluating. TAM Mapping evaluates whether the available evidence supports their inclusion within the defined market.
What TAM Mapping ownsApplying defined market conditions to organisational evidence.
For TAM Mapping, eligibility means that the available evidence supports an organisation as satisfying the material inclusion conditions established for the agreed market definition.
Eligibility is purpose-specific, condition-specific and evidence-dependent. It may need to be reconsidered when the market definition changes or materially different evidence becomes available.
The available evidence may support inclusion or exclusion. In other cases, eligibility may remain conditional or unresolved because a material condition, organisational fact or part of the market definition cannot yet be established sufficiently.
TAM Mapping must not collapse eligibility into a binary included/not-included decision where the evidence or market definition does not support that certainty.